Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Euro2012 in Free Software: Semi-finals

Once again, due to travelling, I was out of internet connectivity for the last few days and couldn’t post the results on the day of the corresponding UEFA games. Sorry for keeping you waiting.

This match was actually not too hard to decide on:
France vs Spain: 3:4

Iceland vs Norway in contrast was hard. I voted in favor of Norway, just because we have more data in the wiki.
Iceland vs Norway: 1:2

I don’t have the time to elaborate further how I came to my conclusions right now, but I’ll deliver it upon request.

So, tomorrow, I will have to make up my mind which country is going to be the European champion in Free Software and open standards: Spain or Norway?

I hope I can find the time to scrutinize the links at hand appropriately. If not, I will just announce the winner at a later date just like the semi finals and a few other results before 😛

 

EURO2012 in Free Software quarter final: Norway vs. Estonia

The last quarter final in our EURO2012 in Free Software. Here is the data we’ve gathered in the wiki:

Norway: public administration and education

Estonia: public administration and unfortunately no data regarding education

Did you follow the links? Can it be any more difficult than that? So, we have on Norways side:

Obligatory IT standards for the state sector already adopted:

All users are supposed to have equal access to public information and services on the internet. The state should not discriminate users based on what kind of technical equipment and soft ware they are using. This decision means that the users are granted a right to watch or download multi-media material from the state in open format; that is, formats not locked to specific suppliers in the market, reform minister Heidi Grande Røys says.

And to our very pleasure, the policy is quite specific:

  • On government operated web sites, from 1.1.2012 it will be obligatory to publish multimedia content in open formats:
    – For video:  Theora/Vorbis/Ogg or H.264/AAC/MP4.
    – For sound: Vorbis/Ogg, MP3 or FLAC/Ogg.
    – For pictures: JPEG or PNG.
  • When exchanging documents as attachments to e-mail between government institutions and users, from 1.1.2011 it will be obligatory to use the document formats PDF or ODF.
  • Version change: From 1.1.2010 the ODF version 1.1 is to be used.
  • The standard for character sets ISO10646, represented by UTF8, is to be used at all new ICT projects in the government sector. From 1.1.2012, UTF8 is to be used during electronic information exchange. It will possible to make exemptions from this demand in special cases.

The UTF8 decision is an important step in enabling the public sector to handle characters in the Sami language and other languages in a correct way.

And of course, Norway is the cradle of Skolelinux.

And on Estonia’s side:

A Joinup article explains:

The Estonian public sector first adopted free/libre/open source software (FLOSS) in 1995 to save costs. Now, it has grown to appreciate the many freedoms such software provides, and all common projects in the Estonian public sector are oriented towards FLOSS

and further:

Today, all common projects in the Estonian public sector are oriented to use Open Source technology.

and

Because it is a major software user, Estonian public sector considers that it has a key role in promoting FLOSS. Thus, the basic software used for the modules of the data exchange layer of national databases (X-Road) is Linux. Besides this, all the software components developed for public access of the X-Road system are based on FLOSS and are available as free software for public sector organisations.

And finally:

For the Estonian Public Sector, the adoption of Open Standards must follow some criteria, such as:

  • the costs of using the standard are low and do not pose an obstacle for its usage;
  • the standard has been published;
  • the standard has been adopted on the basis of an open decision-making procedure;
  • the intellectual property rights to the standard are vested in a non-profit organisation which operates a completely free access policy;
  • there are no constraints on the re-use of the standard.
  • Finally, the advantages of the open source software are to be considered by all central and local government agencies alongside proprietary alternatives.

Now, in this article it says (emphasis added):

The newly published open source policy is part of Estonia IT interoperability framework. It outlines principles for public administrations when purchasing software. For instance, open standards should be supported by all new IT systems and by interacting IT systems and joint projects. The policy also says that ‘depending on certain-brand-based products and services is to be avoided in information systems’.

I don’t want to quote too much, I’m afraid I already did. There are one or two more “shoulds” in this policy.

These “shoulds” cost Estonia the semi final in my view, because Norway firmly demands open standards and even explicitly names them. File formats every Free Software user can access.

My vote: 4:3 (Norway:Estonia)

DSC01150, Song Fest Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia

(cc-by 2.0 by lync883)

 

EURO2012 in Free Software quarter final: Russia vs. Spain

One more result in our EURO2012 in Free Software. It doesn’t get any easier to come to a comclusion. See what data we’ve gathered in the wiki:

Russia: public administration and education

Spain: public administration and education

If the first thing you read is this blog post by Glyn Moody, you may be tempted to ask no more questions and grant Russia the entrance to the semifinal. Spain has a lot of regions and municipalities who switched to Free Software and the Free Software usage in education is also very popular, but migrating all public administrations and all schools certainly tops that. The problem I see here however, is that we have not much data about what actually has happened in Russia. Does anybody know?

Looking at the data we do have at hand, e.g. this detailed report (pdf, 150 pages) by CENATIC, Spain already accomplished a lot. And as we know from other countries, big plans don’t necessarily have to turn out big at the end. So, I decide 2:3 for Spain. If Russia indeed will implement its great plans, I shall decide otherwise in 2016.

Russia sells itself to whomever pays more! (cc-by 2.0 by FreedomHouse)

Russia sells itself to whomever pays more! (cc-by 2.0 by FreedomHouse)

 

As a side note: Software freedom is not the only freedom I would like to see in the world.

Euro2012 in Free Software quarter final: Italy vs. Iceland

Today’s match in the EURO2012 is Italy vs. Iceland. Here is what we have in the wiki:

Iceland: public administration (1 entry) and education (3 entries)

Italy: public administration (18 entires)  and education 6 entries)

Looks easy at the first glance, but it’s not. The one entry for Iceland weighs a lot. It mentions a nationwide policy on Free Software that is worth reading (only 5 pages). The wording of the 1st point is somewhat weak, but the policy as a whole shows clearly that the government understood the importance of Free Software and open standards as well as the freedoms and benefits that come with them.

But according to what I heard at last FSCONS, they seem to walk their talk as well and the three entries in education back this up. Looking at the population of both countries 300.000 vs. 60.000.000, it is also clear that there can’t be that many news coming from that island. Most of the entries in Italy mention the region of Bolzano which has only a third of the population Iceland has. We judge whole countries here and not some selected parts.  In other words I voted 5:4 for Iceland. Feel free to comment if you disagree or to express your agreement as usual.

099 gnuckx Giardini Naxos-Messina-Sicilia-Italy-castielli_CC0_HQ

Giardini Naxos-Messina-Sicilia (cc0 by gnuckx)

 

Euro2012 in Free Software quarter final: France vs. Germany

As I wrote in the last posting, the coming matches are indeed tough. When I wrote that, I thought that at least this particular match is one of the easier ones to decide on. I was wrong. I was almost certain that Germany has no chance against France, but at least to me,the data in the wiki shows  more in favor to Germany than France¹.

See yourself:

Germany: public administration and education

France: public administration and education

So, I decide on a 4:3

Being a German myself and still very disappointed about the move of the Ministry of foreign affairs back to proprietary software, I don’t feel comfortable to grant Germany the entrance to the semi final and would love to hear more opinions on that, here in the comments, per mail or identi.ca.

¹ so, I WAS right when I thought this match is one of the easier ones, it just turned out the opposite way than I expected.

Euro2012 in Free Software – Group D results

Welcome again to another day of the EURO2012 for Free Software! Here are the results of Group D in the final round:

Spain Estonia 4 4
Spain Belgium 4 3
Spain Israel 4 2
Estonia Belgium 3 1
Estonia Israel 4 1
Belgium Israel 3 1

And the table looks like this:

Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Estonia 3 2 1 0 11 6 5 7
Spain 3 2 1 0 12 9 3 7
Belgium 3 1 0 2 7 8 -1 3
Israel 3 0 0 3 4 11 -7 0

We have to say good bye to Belgium and Israel.

Belgium

cc-by 2.0 by M-j-H

So, we’ll see the following matches in the next few days:

  • France vs. Germany

  • Italy vs. Iceland

  • Russia vs. Spain

  • Norway vs. Estonia

Since I won’t be allowed to decide on a draw anymore, this is going to be tough. Any help or suggestions are very welcome!

EURO2012 in Free Software – Group C results

Welcome again to another day of the EURO2012 for Free Software! Here are the results of Group C in the final round:

Poland Germany 2 3
Poland Switzerland 3 3
Poland Iceland 1 3
Germany Switzerland 3 2
Germany Iceland 3 3
Switzerland Iceland 2 3

The table looks like this:

Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Iceland 3 2 1 0 9 6 3 7
Germany 3 2 1 0 9 7 2 7
Switzerland 3 0 1 2 7 9 -2 1
Poland 3 0 1 2 6 9 -3 1

Good Bye to Switzerland and Poland (if you don’t speak up).

XXXX Reise durch die Schweiz : Griessee und Bättelmatthorn im Kanton Wallis in der Schweiz

cc-by-sa 2.0 by Hurni Christoph

Euro2012 in Free Software – Group B results

Welcome again to another day of the EURO2012 for Free Software! Here are the results of Group B in the final round:

Norway Netherlands 4 3
Norway Russia 3 4
Norway Malta 3 2
Netherlands Russia 4 5
Netherlands Malta 3 2
Russia Malta 4 2

The table looks like this:

 

Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Russia 3 3 0 0 13 9 4 9
Norway 3 2 0 1 10 9 1 6
Netherlands 3 1 0 2 10 11 -1 3
Malta 3 0 0 3 6 10 -4 0

Good bye to the Netherlands and Malta.

Netherlands fan dressed as a lion

cc-by 2.0 by Shine_2010

Euro2012 in Free Software – Group A results

Yesterday was the last day in group A of the UEFA soccer championship. So, I am not entirely too late :)As already posted on identi.ca, here are the results of the matches in Group A:

France Ukraine 4 1
France Italy 5 5
France England 4 2
Ukraine Italy 1 3
Ukraine England 1 2
Italy England 4 2

Which leads to the following table:

 

Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
France 3 2 1 0 13 8 5 7
Italy 3 2 1 0 12 8 4 7
England 3 1 0 2 6 9 -3 3
Ukraine 3 0 0 3 3 9 -6 0

So, we have to say goodbye to England and the Ukraine today.

When England lost the game

England is out (cc-by-sa 2.0)

Every group will have its last matches in the following days, so I will try to one group per day until Tuesday.

 

Euro2012 in Free Software goes on, eventually…

Apologies. I mentioned it in the last posting that I most likely won’t have internet access during the finals and promised to send updates. I didn’t. It turned out that the time before I left was too hectic to post anything earlier than today. The UEFA EURO2012 drew the groups for the knock out phase already in December, and I did it in May, but didn’t get to post it until today:

Group A

  • France
  • Ukraine
  • Italy
  • England

Group B

  • Norway
  • Netherlands
  • Russia
  • Malta

Group C

  • Poland
  • Germany
  • Switzerland
  • Iceland

Group D

  • Spain
  • Estonia
  • Belgium
  • Israel

I still don’t know how I shall manage to post the results and to incorporate feed-back since I’ve been traveling in different time zones without reliable internet connectivity. Any suggestions and help is very welcome!

I guess I will use the identi.ca group euro2012fs (aka euro4fs) for single results and sum them up here.

Whatever I post, I will still accept feedback and am willing to change results until the end of July. This is far from what I envisioned back in 2010, but there’s nothing I can do about it right now. :/