Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Bildungsleitbild Südtirol

Bei der Recherche für das Bildungs-Team der FSFE, stieß ich auch das offizielle Bildungsleitbild für Südtirol. Schön zu lesen, wie einige Passagen geradezu nach Freier Software schreien:

Sich zu bilden ist ein Grundrecht – von Anfang an, innerhalb und außerhalb der Bildungseinrichtungen bis ins hohe Alter. Bildung ermöglicht individuelle Lebensgestaltung, persönliche Entwicklung, berufliche Qualifizierung und Teilhabe an der Gesellschaft. Dem Leitbild liegt ein Menschenbild zu Grunde, das den Menschen als einzigartig, weitgehend selbstbestimmt, sozial verantwortlich und lebenslang lernfähig sieht. Lernen ist ein Lebensprinzip. Neugierde und Bestätigung sind Motoren des Lernens. Am besten gelingt dies in einem Klima des Vertrauens und der Wertschätzung.

Klingt fast wie eine Beschreibung der Freie Software Gemeinschaft, was?

Wissen als Resource soll jedem zur Verfügung stehen:

Wissen ist eine zentrale Ressource für die Entwicklung des Einzelnen und der Gesellschaft. Der Zugang zu Wissen soll kapillar auch für die kleinsten Einheiten des kulturellen, wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Lebens erreichbar sein.

Wie wichtig es ist, in der Muttersprache zu lernen, was proprietäre Software ja nicht immer erlaubt:

Die Erstsprache ist grundlegend für jedes weitere Lernen

Aus der Vielfalt Entscheidungen treffen:

Bildung bereitet den Menschen darauf vor, in der Vielfalt der Möglichkeiten Entscheidungen zu treffen, mit unterschiedlichen Einstellungen und Werthaltungen umzugehen und sich in der komplexer werdenden Welt zu orientieren.

Wissen erschließen:

Bildung umfasst insbesondere die Fähigkeit, Wissen zu erschließen und Verantwortung zu übernehmen.

Partizipation

Partizipation fördert das Übernehmen von Verantwortung und das Aneignen von sozialen und kommunikativen Kompetenzen – Voraussetzungen für ein erfolgreiches Leben in der demokratischen Gesellschaft.

Wer dieses Leitbild umsetzen will, kommt an Freier Software nicht vorbei 🙂

Wie sieht es denn heute aus in Südtirol?

Flatschbergtal beim Ultental Südtirol (cc-by)

Flatschbergtal beim Ultental Südtirol (cc-by)

 

Edu-Team 2011 summary

When I talk to people as a member of FSFE’s education team, there’s always the question what we are actually doing. It is not so easy to come up with something specific. I know we’ve been busy all the time, but ad hoc, it’s difficult for me to name examples, that are worth mentioning. A lot of work that’s being done just doesn’t provide a presentable outcome (more on that below). With this post, I’ll publicly report what we’ve done in 2011 and give a brief overview of what is about to come in 2012.

For me, the main task was drafting the mission statement. It took us a few months, but finally we had something to point at when people asked. And by people I don’t mean only distant strangers, I also mean us. Everybody had his own vague idea what we are supposed to be doing. There was no way to tell if we really had that much in common at all. So, we drafted the statement, asked the public (friends) in various mailing lists for feed-back and at the end agreed on the final version. And from that point on, every new edu-team member knew what he may expect from joining. The statement may evolve over time, so I rather conserve the current version here:

The goal of FSFE’s Education Team is to bring the benefits of Free Software to all education-related activities and institutions. In accordance with FSFE’s Self Conception, we shall bring the use of Free Software in education to political agendas across European borders, and inform administrations, teachers, students and their parents about the benefits Free Software provides.

We shall foster communication and cooperation among these groups, and establish and extend dialogue between them and Free Software developers and advocates. We shall establish a legal framework that shall prohibit discrimination against Free Software and its users, and make available FSFE’s extensive expertise to all parties involved.

The second big thing for the edu-team was our involvement in the NLedu campaign. The preparation took some time and since the main discussions are done in dutch, it’s hard for non dutch participants to follow it. But Jan Stedehouder published the first newsletter about it recently also in English. If you read dutch, his blog is currently the best resource for news about it. Come join us!

Edu-Team members were also busy giving talks at events in 2011:

That is not all, there are quite a few other things we did:

We worked on a few of our leaflets. We are constantly fine tuning them and want to tailor them to address specific target groups. If you have any feed-back or want to help with that, please let us know!

Thanks to Nico and others, the edu leaflets were translated into French for RMLL . And thanks to CeDeC, the main education leaflet is now also available in Spanish.

We got asked if we had some teaching material for explaining Free Software to kids. I thought that should be easy to find, since there are so many people out there trying to bring Free Software into schools. I really tried hard, but surprisingly with no success. If you know of any freely usable materials in this direction, please let us know! We may end up creating such material eventually, but I still can’t believe that there is nothing already out there and would like to prevent the duplicate work.

The Finnish National Board of Education has funded a project in which edu-team member Elias Aarnio and others were searching a Learning Management System that would work together with Ubuntu based LTSP used in the schools of Kemi.

We helped and came up with edu related questions for the “ask your candidates” campaign that were sent to parties in various countries. Edu-Team member Peter Beck sent the questions to the political parties in Liechtenstein

We started collaborating with the edu group at gnu.org.

Sam Tuke published open letter to the Guardian asking for Open Standards for their educational resources.

Sebastian published an article in Freies Magazin, November edition (German).

Chris Woolfrey interviewed me for the Fellowship interview in June.

After the one in November 2010, there was another freedroidz workshop in Berlin (Germany).

I created and identi.ca group “eduteam” just for the sake of it, but I have no plans on how to use it yet. Would you follow it?

We were also working on our internal infrastructure, mailing lists, etherpad, wiki and managed to arrange some personal meetings among edu-team members.

And of course many little brief contacts and general networking, like providing feed-back to an ICT principle of a school in UK, looking to engage girls 11-14 with Free Software, help a Russian school to provide their materials in Free formats and reply to various other questions.

I have to work on my blogging habit which got less and less during the year, but I blame the preparations for the talks for that 🙂 I began with publishing summaries of edu related news in Europe bi-monthly, but discarded that approach in favor of a more regular post-it-when-you-see-it method. Unfortunately, this didn’t work and led only to three more edu postings, which is less than the number of postings if I hadn’t changed my bi-montlhy routine.

Thus, all the news I found and sent to the edu-eu mailing list after March, didn’t make it into this blog 🙁. To name a few:

And of course there were a few things that didn’t work out. Luckily, most of them can be called rather postponed for 2012 than canceled.

I couldn’t attend the general assembly of FSuB e.V. in Berlin.

I heard that the organizers of the OpenRheinRuhr had planned to invite teachers to inform them about Free Software. We offered our help, but somehow this didn’t work out. The good thing about this was, that I could then attend FSCONS instead :).

We got contacted by Martin Ebner, university Graz, co-author of L3T (textbook for lerning and teaching with technology) who invited us to an OER conference. Unfortunately, nobody was able to participate.

we followed quite a few hints suggested by others but had to discard them. This was partly very time consuming, but didn’t produce any visible or measurable result, but we gained some experience what might be worth pursuing in the future which will save time eventually.

A talk for teachers had to be postponed because the conference got canceled and so was a freedroidz workshop with kids in Stuttgart.

And my excuse for everything I didn’t get to in 2010 is the birth of my 2nd child, Kanoa Tayne, in May 🙂

 

So, what’s next in 2012?

We’ll continue what we’ve been doing, like working on the NLEdu campaign, improve the edu pages on fsfe.org, the leaflets and the wiki, plan more FreeDroidz workshops (Berlin, Bonn and Stuttgart are in the works), give more talks, publish more articles in magazines and blogs, share edu related infos and network with activists throughout Europe.

So far, so good. Anything new? Yes.

Hooked up at FSCONS’ accessibility track, I got interested in the matter and also a little concerned that the Free Software that is already being used, might be banned from class in the future if strict accessibility requirements are set by law (which I’d consider generally as a good thing, btw). Developing the necessary tools will require money. The EU is currently spending some for the AEGIS project, but this will run out soon. What’s missing is a sustainable, continuous flow of money for the development of Free accessibility tools, according to Mats Lundälv in his talk. But all this might be worth a separate posting once we gathered enough information about the matter.

We’ll also spend some time investigating what can be done in Extremadura where more and more concerning news emerge.

And we might very well chose to pick up any subject you suggest!

 

Update (Jan 12, 2013:  Miguel Ángel Pereira Baz informed me about the following edu related blog posts by CEDEC (all in Spanish):

Euro2012 play-offs

This post was meant to be published in November, but somehow it didn’t. Anyway, here are the results of the playoffs in our Euro2012 in Free Software.

In the last Euro2012 posting, I was thinking about drawing lots for the play-offs like in the UEFA tournament, but decided to ensure that only the best teams will reach the finals. So the strongest will face the weakest, the 2nd strongest the 2nd weakest, etc.

Here is the table with the attached quotient since not all teams had the same amount of matches:

Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts PtsQ GDQ GFQ
Romania 10 8 0 2 20 15 5 24 2.4 0.5 2
Iceland 8 6 0 2 22 16 6 18 2.25 0.75 2.75
Czech republic 8 6 0 2 10 4 6 18 2.25 0.75 1.25
Germany 10 7 1 2 34 14 20 22 2.2 2 3.4
Hungary 10 7 0 3 29 16 13 21 2.1 1.3 2.9
Malta 10 6 2 2 18 13 5 20 2 0.5 1.8
Macedonia 10 6 1 3 16 12 4 19 1.9 0.4 1.6
England 8 3 3 2 11 10 1 12 1.5 0.13 1.38

So, here are the matches with the results:

Romania England 1 2
Iceland Macedonia 4 1
Czech Republic Malta 1 2
Germany Hungary 3 2

Let me know if you disagree with the results. Now, everything is set for the finals. Unfortunately, it looks as if I will not be in Europe during the finals and can’t predict if I have Internet access or not. But I will keep you posted.

Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education

Cleaning up my notes folder, I found an article about the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education:

1. encourages contact between students and faculty,
2. develops reciprocity and cooperation among students,
3. encourages active learning,
4. gives prompt feedback,
5. emphasizes time on task,
6. communicates high expectations, and
7. respects diverse talents and ways of learning.

It seems to me that these principles can be useful in other areas as well. That paper is from The American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, March 1987. I am sure they didn’t have software in mind when they wrote it, but it is obvious that these principles can only really be followed by using Free Software. 🙂

EURO2012 in Free Software – regular qualification is over!

Today was the last day of the regular qualification in our EURO2012 in Free Software and open standards.. Quite some interesting games like Germany vs. Belgium, Sweden vs. Netherlands or Denmark vs. Portugal today!

Look at the list below for the results and the almost final group tables. “Almost final” because you can still complain about the results until the end of the week :). After that, we’ll enter the play-offs for the remaining places in the final round.

Today’s results:

Date Group Country I Country II Score I Score II
11.10.11 A Germany Belgium 3 3
11.10.11 A Kazakhstan Austria 0 4
11.10.11 A Turkey Azerbaijan 2 0
11.10.11 B Macedonia Slovakia 2 2
11.10.11 B Republic of Ireland Armenia 1 0
11.10.11 C Italy Nothern Ireland 5 1
11.10.11 C Slovenia Serbia 1 0
11.10.11 D Albania Romania 0 1
11.10.11 D France Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 0
11.10.11 E Hungary Finland 3 2
11.10.11 E Moldova San Marino 0 0
11.10.11 E Sweden Netherlands 4 4
11.10.11 F Croatia Latvia 0 2
11.10.11 F Georgia Greece 0 3
11.10.11 F Malta Israel 3 2
11.10.11 G Bulgaria Wales 2 2
11.10.11 G Switzerland Montenegro 4 1
11.10.11 H Denmark Portugal 4 5
11.10.11 H Norway Cyprus 3 1
11.10.11 I Lithuania Czech republic 0 2
11.10.11 I Spain Scotland 5 0

And here are the group tables:

Group A
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Belgium 10 8 1 1 26 18 8 25
2 Germany 10 7 1 2 34 14 20 22
3 Austria 10 6 0 4 24 12 12 18
4 Turkey 10 5 0 5 19 20 -1 15
5 Azerbaijan 10 1 2 7 10 14 -4 5
6 Kazakhstan 10 0 2 8 0 26 -26 2
Group B
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Russia 10 10 0 0 31 8 23 30
2 Macedonia 10 6 1 3 16 12 4 19
3 Slovakia 10 4 3 3 12 14 -2 15
4 Andorra 10 3 1 6 7 6 1 10
5 Republic of Ireland 10 2 4 4 9 14 -5 10
6 Armenia 10 0 1 9 1 15 -14 1
Group C
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Italy 10 9 1 0 36 11 25 28
2 Estonia 10 8 1 1 35 8 27 25
3 Slovenia 10 3 3 4 10 15 -5 12
4 Serbia 10 2 3 5 4 14 -10 9
5 Nothern Ireland 10 0 5 5 4 19 -15 5
6 Faroe Islands 10 0 3 7 0 16 -16 3
Group D
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 France 10 10 0 0 40 9 31 30
2 Romania 10 8 0 2 20 15 5 24
3 Albania 10 3 2 5 9 10 -1 11
4 Luxembourg 10 3 2 5 12 18 -6 11
5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10 2 4 4 9 16 -7 10
6 Belarus 10 0 0 10 1 17 -16 0
Group E
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Netherlands 10 9 1 0 41 15 26 28
2 Hungary 10 7 0 3 29 16 13 21
3 Sweden 10 5 2 3 28 18 10 17
4 Finland 10 5 1 4 23 17 6 16
5 Moldova 10 0 2 8 0 27 -27 2
6 San Marino 10 0 2 8 0 28 -28 2
Group F
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Israel 10 7 1 2 23 11 12 22
2 Malta 10 6 2 2 18 13 5 20
3 Latvia 10 6 0 4 18 14 4 18
4 Croatia 10 5 1 4 15 10 5 16
5 Greece 10 3 2 5 12 17 -5 11
6 Georgia 10 0 0 10 0 18 -18 0
Group G
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Switzerland 8 8 0 0 22 9 13 24
2 England 8 3 3 2 11 10 1 12
3 Bulgaria 8 2 3 3 11 10 1 9
4 Wales 8 2 3 3 10 13 -3 9
5 Montenegro 8 0 1 7 5 14 -9 1
Group H
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Norway 8 6 1 1 24 17 7 19
2 Iceland 8 6 0 2 22 16 6 18
3 Portugal 8 4 0 4 25 21 4 12
4 Denmark 8 3 1 4 22 22 0 10
5 Cyprus 8 0 0 8 9 13 -4 0
Group I
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
1 Spain 8 8 0 0 34 5 29 24
2 Czech republic 8 6 0 2 10 4 6 18
3 Scotland 8 3 1 4 4 11 -7 10
4 Liechtenstein 8 0 3 5 1 11 -10 3
5 Lithuania 8 0 2 6 0 14 -14 2

For the qualification, Wikipedia says:

“There are nine groups. Six of these groups have six teams (one each from pots 1 to 6 below); the remaining three groups consist of five
teams (one each from pots 1 to 5 below). At the conclusion of group play, the first-place team in each group qualifies, along with the
second-place team with the most points against teams ranked in the top five in the group. The remaining eight second-place teams are paired for a two game playoff, with the winner of each total goals tie qualifying for the finals. The two host countries complete the field
of sixteen teams.”

So, here are the group leaders who are qualified for the finals in 2012:

  • Belgium
  • Russia
  • Italy
  • France
  • Netherlands
  • Israel
  • Switzerland
  • Norway
  • Spain

ignoring the matches with the last placed teams, Estonia is also qualified.

BXP135660

Anticipation (cc-by 2.0 BXP135660)

The remaining eight “second placed” countries go into the play-offs:

  • Germany
  • Macedonia
  • Romania
  • Hungary
  • Malta
  • England
  • Iceland
  • Czech republic

Who will play against whom needs to be determined. I guess I will just draw by lot. Any other suggestions?

I think I am going to leave the UEFA procedure here because there is no such thing as home field advantage in our machtes and thus I see only little sense in doing a first and second leg match. So, they will be only 4 more qualification matches in the play-offs and they will all take place on November 15, right after FSCONS. See you then!

Euro2012 in Free Software, qualification results – October 8, 2011

Next-to-last day of the qualification in our EURO 2012 in Free Software and open standards. There is only one match today:

Liechtenstein vs. Scotland  0:0

There can’t be any other result, because there is nothing in the Fellowship wiki about these countries. I personally know of a at least a few who work hard to change this in Liechtenstein (one is a member of the edu-team), but are there also some brave hearts working on it in Scotland?

My dog being bored

boring day (cc-by joshme17)

As announced yesterday, the final group tables will be published next Tuesday.

Euro2012 in Free Software – qualification results Oct 7, 2011

Another day in our EURO 2012 in Free Software and open standards. Once again, I have no time to elaborate the results in detail and have to spit the plain table of todays results on this blog without any further comment. As always, just tell me if you would have judged otherwise within the next days:

Date Group Country I Country II Score I Score II
07.10.11 A Azerbaijan Austria 3 0
07.10.11 A Belgium Kazakhstan 3 0
07.10.11 A Turkey Germany 2 3
07.10.11 B Andorra Republic of Ireland 1 1
07.10.11 B Armenia Macedonia 0 2
07.10.11 B Slovakia Russia 1 4
07.10.11 C Nothern Ireland Estonia 1 4
07.10.11 C Serbia Italy 1 3
07.10.11 D Bosnia and Herzegovina Luxembourg 1 1
07.10.11 D France Albania 4 1
07.10.11 D Romania Belarus 3 1
07.10.11 E Finland Sweden 3 2
07.10.11 E Netherlands Moldova 4 0
07.10.11 F Greece Croatia 2 1
07.10.11 F Latvia Malta 1 3
07.10.11 G Montenegro England 0 1
07.10.11 G Wales Switzerland 1 4
07.10.11 H Cyprus Denmark 1 3
07.10.11 H Portugal Iceland 4 2
07.10.11 I Czech republic Spain 1 4

The regular qualification will be over on Tuesday Oct 11. I’ll publish the final tables then and we’ll see which teams made it and which ones can hope to qualify in the remaining play-offs.

Euro2012 in Free Software – qualification results Sep 6

Quite a few matches in our EURO 2012 in Free Software and open standards again. Very interesting encounters among them. I marked them bold in the table below. I’d love to comment on all of them, but I don’t have the time for it. Please check the information in the Fellowship wiki and let me know if you are content with the results:

Date Group Country I Country II Score I Score II
06.09.11 A Austria Turkey 3 1
06.09.11 A Azerbaijan Kazakhstan 0 0
06.09.11 B Macedonia Andorra 0 1
06.09.11 B Russia Republic of Ireland 4 1
06.09.11 B Slovakia Armenia 1 0
06.09.11 C Estonia Nothern Ireland 4 1
06.09.11 C Italy Slovenia 4 1
06.09.11 C Serbia Faroe Islands 1 0
06.09.11 D Bosnia and Herzegovina Belarus 1 0
06.09.11 D Luxembourg Albania 2 1
06.09.11 D Romania France 2 4
06.09.11 E Finland Netherlands 3 4
06.09.11 E Moldova Hungary 0 3
06.09.11 E San Marino Sweden 0 3
06.09.11 F Croatia Israel 2 2
06.09.11 F Latvia Greece 3 1
06.09.11 F Malta Georgia 3 0
06.09.11 G England Wales 2 1
06.09.11 G Switzerland Bulgaria 3 2
06.09.11 H Denmark Norway 3 4
06.09.11 H Iceland Cyprus 4 1
06.09.11 I Scotland Lithuania 1 0
06.09.11 I Spain Liechtenstein 5 0

Well the group matches will be over in October and it is going to be very interesting who will win in the remaining play-offs after that. Looking at the current tables, there were no massive changes in ranks. It may be worth to mention that Russia and Switzerland are for sure in the finals since their group members can’t beat them anymore.

Group A
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Belgium 8 7 0 1 31 13 18 21
Germany 8 6 0 2 28 13 15 18
Austria 8 5 0 3 27 9 18 15
Turkey 8 4 0 4 15 16 -1 12
Kazakhstan 8 0 2 6 0 20 -20 2
Azerbaijan 8 0 2 6 0 21 -21 2
Group B
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Russia 8 8 0 0 23 6 17 24
Macedonia 8 5 0 3 12 10 2 15
Slovakia 8 4 2 2 9 8 1 14
Andorra 8 3 0 5 5 2 3 9
Republic of Ireland 8 1 3 4 7 13 -6 6
Armenia 8 0 1 7 1 12 -11 1
Group C
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Estonia 9 7 1 1 31 7 24 22
Italy 8 7 1 0 28 9 19 22
Slovenia 9 2 3 4 9 15 -6 9
Serbia 8 2 3 3 3 10 -7 9
Nothern Ireland 8 0 5 3 2 10 -8 5
Faroe Islands 10 0 3 7 0 16 -16 3
Group D
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
France 8 8 0 0 32 8 24 24
Romania 8 6 0 2 16 14 2 18
Albania 8 3 2 3 8 5 3 11
Luxembourg 9 3 1 5 11 17 -6 10
Bosnia and Herzegovina 8 2 3 3 8 11 -3 9
Belarus 9 0 0 9 0 14 -14 0
Group E
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Netherlands 8 8 0 0 33 11 22 24
Hungary 9 6 0 3 26 14 12 18
Sweden 8 5 1 2 22 11 11 16
Finland 8 4 1 3 18 5 13 13
Moldova 8 0 1 7 0 23 -23 1
San Marino 9 0 1 8 0 28 -28 1
Group F
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Israel 9 7 1 1 21 8 13 22
Croatia 8 5 1 2 14 6 8 16
Latvia 8 5 0 3 15 11 4 15
Malta 8 4 2 2 12 10 2 14
Greece 8 1 2 5 7 16 -9 5
Georgia 9 0 0 9 0 15 -15 0
Group G
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Switzerland 6 6 0 0 14 7 7 18
England 7 2 3 2 10 10 0 9
Bulgaria 7 2 2 3 9 8 1 8
Wales 6 2 2 2 7 7 0 8
Montenegro 6 0 1 5 4 9 -5 1
Group H
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Iceland 7 6 0 1 20 12 8 18
Norway 7 5 1 1 21 16 5 16
Denmark 6 2 1 3 15 16 -1 7
Portugal 5 2 0 4 16 15 1 6
Cyprus 5 0 0 6 7 10 -3 0
Group I
Team Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts
Spain 6 6 0 0 25 4 21 18
Czech republic 6 5 0 1 7 4 3 15
Scotland 6 2 1 3 3 6 -3 7
Liechtenstein 7 0 3 4 1 10 -9 3
Lithuania 7 0 2 5 0 12 -12 2

Euro2012 in Free Software – Qualification results Sep 3, 2011

Only one match today in our EURO 2012 in Free Software and open standards:

Scotland vs. Czech Republic 0:1

Nothing fancy to report here. I’ll sum the three days in September after the 6th.

Euro 2012 in Free Software – qualification results Sep 2, 2011

Another day in our EURO 2012 in Free Software and open standards. I won’t comment on the matches today, there will be more tomorrow. I missed one match in August, but I couldn’t get to it. It ended 0:0 anyway, so you didn’t miss much.

Here are the results:


group T I T II S I S II
10.08.11 C Northern Ireland Faroe Islands 0 0
02.09.11 A Azerbaijan Belgium 0 4

A Turkey Kazakhstan 3 0

A Germany Austria 3 4

B Russia FYROM 3 1

B Andorra Armenia 1 0

B Republic of Ireland Slovaika 1 1

C Northern Ireland Serbia 0 0

C Slovenia Estonia 3 4

C Faroe Island Italy 0 4

D Belarus Bosnia Herzegovina 0 1

D Luxembourg Romania 1 2

D Albania France 0 4

E Finland Moldova 3 0

E Hungary Sweden 3 4

E Netherlands San Marino 4 0

F Israel Greece 2 1

F Georgia Latvia 0 2

F Malta Croatia 2 1

G Bulgaria England 1 1

G Wales Montenegro 2 1

H Norway Iceland 3 2

H Cyprus Portugal 1 4
I Lithuania Liechtenstein 0 0

If you have anything to add, please leave a comment, drop me a note or edit the Fellowship wiki page about FS in public administration or write a dent to the euro4fs group at identi.ca.