Tag Archives: Microsoft

Groklaw article: Microsoft, antitrust and innovation

[http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070923170905803] Microsoft, antitrust and innovation — by Georg C. F. Greve If one were to believe Microsoft, antitrust law is for sore losers who are too lazy to innovate, and the decision of the European Court of Justice against Microsoft … Continue reading

Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Groklaw article: Microsoft, antitrust and innovation

So this is what hit Microsoft…

The past two months have been interesting in the Chinese sense. A primary culprit of that was Microsoft’s failed attempt to push their proprietary MS-OOXML format through ISO. But there were also talks and meetings with ministers (see [1][2]) to … Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on So this is what hit Microsoft…

The Inquirer on MS-OOXML and ODF

The Inquirer has an interesting opinion piece called "Microsoft twists and turns over ODF" in which they pick up on the MS-OOXML conversion hoax: The problem is that if Robertson and Paoli’s early claim is correct would be theoretically impossible … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on The Inquirer on MS-OOXML and ODF

MS-OOXML conversion hoax

Microsoft has been quite busy signing up various associates such as Novell, Xandros, Linspire and Turbolinux to work on its MS-OOXML converter. This was somewhat surprising. To make myself clear: It was no surprise that Microsoft would try to enroll … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on MS-OOXML conversion hoax

BBC: Questions for Microsoft on open formats

The BBC just put an article by FSFE media coordinator Joachim Jakobs and myself online in which we respond to an earlier article on a "time bomb" in the UK National Archives. What Microsoft carefully sought to avoid mentioning in … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on BBC: Questions for Microsoft on open formats

Massachusetts: thumbs up for lock-in

While FSFE was busy holding its 2007 general assembly in Brussels, Belgium, the world kept spinning. In this case backwards, unfortunately. After the state of Massachusetts had become famous for its clear-sighted move towards Open Standards in general and the … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on Massachusetts: thumbs up for lock-in

OLPC = “One License Per Child?”

The past days found me attending the Yale A2K2 conference in New Haven where an insipring group of people were discussing issues of the knowledge society and how to enable Access to Knowledge for everyone. Naturally, Free Software played a … Continue reading

Tagged , , | Comments Off on OLPC = “One License Per Child?”

Update on OpenXML vs ODF

Thanks to one of my favorite web comics, Everybody loves Eric Raymond, I discovered two rather interesting articles in the OpenXML and ODF debate. The first article is by Miguel de Icaza from end of January in which he says … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on Update on OpenXML vs ODF

OpenXML back on fast-track

Groklaw has an article that OpenXML is back on the fast-track for ISO certification, ignoring an usually high number of objections from various countries: *She* decided? So the objections process is an elaborate waltz with no purpose? Why even have … Continue reading

Tagged , | Comments Off on OpenXML back on fast-track

Irony, cynicism or simply “cara de pau”?

Imagine a fox building “fox and chicken can be friends” ads from the feathers of slaughtered chicken. Would this be irony or cynicism, or possibly both? I had the same problem when I saw the following ad: Microsoft is a … Continue reading

Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Irony, cynicism or simply “cara de pau”?