<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tonnerre Lombard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre</link>
	<description>FFII's coordinator for Switzerland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Papers for CoSin 2010</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/76</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 9th to 11th, the Chaos Singularity (CoSin) is taking place for the 5th time. The Chaos Singularity is an event with presentations, workshops, discussions and information about technology, internet politics and geek culture. It is organized annually by the Chaos Computer Club Zurich (CCCZH) and Chaostreff Basel. You&#8217;re invited to submit talks and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/76/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Parliament solicits opinion on the Parliament Register</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/72</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/72#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Parliament is currently conducting an opinion poll about the Parliament Register. The survey covers merely how the query system works (which, in my opinion, is very spartanic and doesn&#8217;t really exceed the power of the early 90s) and how the results are presented. This survey however provides every EU citizen with a chance [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/72/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gnome did not go Mono</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Profitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has recently been a lot of rumors about the article Gnome goes Mono and jumps into the patent trap. There are some things that should be clarified about this as they appear to be frequently misunderstood.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Patents Appeal Board throws out business methods</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/66</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/66#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Profitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Patents Appeal Board has ruled that business methods are not eligible for patent protection. Hopefully this will add some weight in the same direction to the Bilski case.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/66/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German anti-censorship petition hits 100&#8217;000 signers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/63</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The German petition against censorship has already been signed by more than 100'000 interested people — more than twice the required quota. However, the German politicians attempt to hush up the issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/63/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM speaks out against software patents</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/57</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/57#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Profitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The international computer manufacturer IBM has filed an amicus brief to the Bilski case in the USA condemning software patents. This is a change in the company's strategy which has evolved slowly over the years.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/57/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preliminary injunction against Microsoft contract</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/52</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The contract granted by the Federal Department of Construction and Logistics to Microsoft has been put on hold by the Federal Administration Court due to a pending case. The injunction explicitly excludes «all licenses required for vital operation of the federal infrastructure».]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/52/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berner Zeitung on a slander campaign against the Canton Solothurn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/47</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/47#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Berner Zeitung currently appears to be on some sort of crusade against the Office for Informatics and Organization (AIO) of the Canton Solothurn. The subject is the Linux strategy of said canton.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/47/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU commission takes another shot at software patents</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/42</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Profitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After their failure to introduce software patents in Europe directly through two directives, then through the community patent and then finally through the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), the European Commission has come up with a new way to legalize software patents: the «United Patent Litigation System».]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal government grants 42 million franks contract to Microsoft — without tender</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/38</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/38#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Swiss federal government published in the Swiss Official Gazette of Commerce that it has granted a maintenance contract over CHF 42 million to Microsoft — however, without a prior tender. The competitors are affronted and threaten to sue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/38/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

