<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gnome did not go Mono</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70</link>
	<description>FFII's coordinator for Switzerland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=70#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nobody is saying that Mono or .NET per se are evil&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nobody is saying that Mono or .NET per se are evil</p></blockquote>
<p>I am!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Piana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Piana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=70#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The post is quite well reasoned. Only it understated the power of ambiguity in patent applications. More frequently than not, the scope of patent protection can be assessed only ex post, because patents are drafted so that any solution to a given problem falls withing the protection. 

Mono is not evil per se, the software patent system is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is quite well reasoned. Only it understated the power of ambiguity in patent applications. More frequently than not, the scope of patent protection can be assessed only ex post, because patents are drafted so that any solution to a given problem falls withing the protection. </p>
<p>Mono is not evil per se, the software patent system is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonnerre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>tonnerre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=70#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Salut,

That is indeed true, but it has not become as much of an integral component as it was originally called for.

Tonnerre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salut,</p>
<p>That is indeed true, but it has not become as much of an integral component as it was originally called for.</p>
<p>Tonnerre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphager</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/archives/70/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/tonnerre/?p=70#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Tomboy is part of Gnome and based on Mono-&gt; Gnome has gone Mono (Mono is a dependancy for Gnome)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomboy is part of Gnome and based on Mono-&gt; Gnome has gone Mono (Mono is a dependancy for Gnome)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

