<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for hugo&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo</link>
	<description>Change Data, Deviate the Norm. — A blog about Free Software, Hacktivism and Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Add Duck Duck Go as a search engine in Gnome Shell by Hugo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/11/add-duck-duck-go-as-a-search-engine-in-gnome-shell/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=405#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Hi cybervegan,

Yes, you are right, DuckDuckGo uses several other crawlers (bing, blekko, yahoo, etc.)
However it does not impact your own personal searches, and most of duckduckgo&#039;s sources are published as Free Software.

You can read http://donttrack.us/ for some more info.

BTW, there&#039;s also YaCy which is very different from duckduckgo because it&#039;s distributed, not centralised: https://fsfe.org/news/2011/news-20111128-01.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi cybervegan,</p>
<p>Yes, you are right, DuckDuckGo uses several other crawlers (bing, blekko, yahoo, etc.)<br />
However it does not impact your own personal searches, and most of duckduckgo&#8217;s sources are published as Free Software.</p>
<p>You can read <a href="http://donttrack.us/" rel="nofollow">http://donttrack.us/</a> for some more info.</p>
<p>BTW, there&#8217;s also YaCy which is very different from duckduckgo because it&#8217;s distributed, not centralised: <a href="https://fsfe.org/news/2011/news-20111128-01.html" rel="nofollow">https://fsfe.org/news/2011/news-20111128-01.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Add Duck Duck Go as a search engine in Gnome Shell by cybervegan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/11/add-duck-duck-go-as-a-search-engine-in-gnome-shell/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>cybervegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=405#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>Hi Hugo,

just wondering why one would want to have duck-duck-go as your search engine, as it uses Bing as its backend (or so I heard)?

I don&#039;t see how Bing and Free Software could work well together - am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hugo,</p>
<p>just wondering why one would want to have duck-duck-go as your search engine, as it uses Bing as its backend (or so I heard)?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how Bing and Free Software could work well together &#8211; am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Letter to Steve Jobs by Mario Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/04/open-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-3/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 17:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=266#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Blackberry Playbook, Xoom, HTC Flyer?...  no one talks about them any more... it is as simple as that THERE ARE NO APPS for these devices...!!! They cost even more money and... there are not faster... so whats the point of buying one of them?

I think no one expected such an improvement in the iPad 2...  I think people seems not to bother much the Flash issue... and yes, what I see is that most people will make  IPad and iPhones compatilble websites.

I agree... Flash sucks big time and someone should said that... Steve said it, and I&#039;m with him on this...!

And by the way... Flash websites suck your battery life as crazy. See the tests on MacBook Pro Air battery life tests on the web... with Flash on it last from 10h to 3 h. 1/3 of battery time... 

So... no one talks about it, but for mobile devices battery life, Flash is just not good...!

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackberry Playbook, Xoom, HTC Flyer?&#8230;  no one talks about them any more&#8230; it is as simple as that THERE ARE NO APPS for these devices&#8230;!!! They cost even more money and&#8230; there are not faster&#8230; so whats the point of buying one of them?</p>
<p>I think no one expected such an improvement in the iPad 2&#8230;  I think people seems not to bother much the Flash issue&#8230; and yes, what I see is that most people will make  IPad and iPhones compatilble websites.</p>
<p>I agree&#8230; Flash sucks big time and someone should said that&#8230; Steve said it, and I&#8217;m with him on this&#8230;!</p>
<p>And by the way&#8230; Flash websites suck your battery life as crazy. See the tests on MacBook Pro Air battery life tests on the web&#8230; with Flash on it last from 10h to 3 h. 1/3 of battery time&#8230; </p>
<p>So&#8230; no one talks about it, but for mobile devices battery life, Flash is just not good&#8230;!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Letter to Steve Jobs by Hugo Roy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/04/open-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-3/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 08:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=266#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] l&#8217;original sur mon blog à la FSFE, en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] l&#8217;original sur mon blog à la FSFE, en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Letter to Steve Jobs by Joe M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/04/open-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-3/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=266#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Apple gambled and they won. They decided not to go with flash and they&#039;re on top of the tablet pc market. We shall see if tablets like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://top10tabletpcs.com/blackberry-playbook&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blackberry Playbook&lt;/a&gt;, the Xoom or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://top10tabletpcs.com/htc-flyer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HTC Flyer&lt;/a&gt; can get closer to the iPad in sales by the end of the year. I highly doubt it but I guess we shall see. The consumer has shown great loyalty to Apple products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple gambled and they won. They decided not to go with flash and they&#8217;re on top of the tablet pc market. We shall see if tablets like the <a href="http://top10tabletpcs.com/blackberry-playbook" rel="nofollow">Blackberry Playbook</a>, the Xoom or the <a href="http://top10tabletpcs.com/htc-flyer" rel="nofollow">HTC Flyer</a> can get closer to the iPad in sales by the end of the year. I highly doubt it but I guess we shall see. The consumer has shown great loyalty to Apple products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Letter to Steve Jobs by Steve Jobs: A Patent Pool is Being Assembled to Go After Theora</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2010/04/open-letter-to-steve-jobs/comment-page-3/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jobs: A Patent Pool is Being Assembled to Go After Theora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=266#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] enough received a reply. You can find both Hugo&#8217;s letter and Jobs&#8217; reply over here. Here I am concerning myself only with Jobs&#8217; reply.From: Steve Jobs To: Hugo Roy Subject: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough received a reply. You can find both Hugo&#8217;s letter and Jobs&#8217; reply over here. Here I am concerning myself only with Jobs&#8217; reply.From: Steve Jobs To: Hugo Roy Subject: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace by Tweets that mention Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace &#124; hugo's blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/02/microsoft-interdit-les-logiciels-libres-sur-son-windows-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace &#124; hugo's blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=330#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Raphaël BECK, Flyn, sebastien dubois, Hugo Roy, Gaétan and others. Gaétan said: RT @TestCross: Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace http://ur1.ca/39fgz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Raphaël BECK, Flyn, sebastien dubois, Hugo Roy, Gaétan and others. Gaétan said: RT @TestCross: Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace <a href="http://ur1.ca/39fgz" rel="nofollow">http://ur1.ca/39fgz</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace by djiock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/02/microsoft-interdit-les-logiciels-libres-sur-son-windows-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>djiock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=330#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Apparemment ils veulent plutôt se débarrasser des licences type &quot;virales&quot;, la BSD ne serait donc pas concernée...
En tout cas c&#039;est comme ça que j&#039;interprète le truc :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparemment ils veulent plutôt se débarrasser des licences type &#8220;virales&#8221;, la BSD ne serait donc pas concernée&#8230;<br />
En tout cas c&#8217;est comme ça que j&#8217;interprète le truc <img src='http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace by Hugo Roy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/02/microsoft-interdit-les-logiciels-libres-sur-son-windows-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=330#comment-279</guid>
		<description>&quot;La question est: cette “permission de redistribuer” est elle requise par la licence?&quot;

Carlo pense que non:
http://jan.wildeboer.net/2011/02/microsoft-absolutely-no-free-software-for-windows-phone-and-xbox-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-2703

Il a probablement raison :)

→ &lt;a href=&quot;http://identi.ca/conversation/63890099&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Conversation sur identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;La question est: cette “permission de redistribuer” est elle requise par la licence?&#8221;</p>
<p>Carlo pense que non:<br />
<a href="http://jan.wildeboer.net/2011/02/microsoft-absolutely-no-free-software-for-windows-phone-and-xbox-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-2703" rel="nofollow">http://jan.wildeboer.net/2011/02/microsoft-absolutely-no-free-software-for-windows-phone-and-xbox-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-2703</a></p>
<p>Il a probablement raison <img src='http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>→ <a href="http://identi.ca/conversation/63890099" rel="nofollow">Conversation sur identi.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft interdit les logiciels libres sur son Windows Marketplace by Hugo Roy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/2011/02/microsoft-interdit-les-logiciels-libres-sur-son-windows-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fsfe.org/hugo/?p=330#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Alors, qu&#039;en pensez-vous? BSD est une licence exclue ou non?

“any license requiring, as a condition of use, modification and/or distribution of the software subject to the license, that the software or other software combined and/or distributed with it be (iii) redistributable at no charge.”

La licence BSD:

&quot;Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:&quot;

Aucune des conditions listées n&#039;impose la &quot;redstribuabilité sans frais&quot;. Mais cette phrase ci-dessus, requiert que les conditions soit respectées pour &lt;strong&gt;permettre la redistribution&lt;/strong&gt;. &quot;Permettre la redistribution&quot; si on n&#039;impose pas de frais, cela signifie &quot;redistribuabilité sans frais&quot;. La question est: cette &quot;permission de redistribuer&quot; est elle requise par la licence? Je pense que oui.

C&#039;est tordu…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alors, qu&#8217;en pensez-vous? BSD est une licence exclue ou non?</p>
<p>“any license requiring, as a condition of use, modification and/or distribution of the software subject to the license, that the software or other software combined and/or distributed with it be (iii) redistributable at no charge.”</p>
<p>La licence BSD:</p>
<p>&#8220;Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:&#8221;</p>
<p>Aucune des conditions listées n&#8217;impose la &#8220;redstribuabilité sans frais&#8221;. Mais cette phrase ci-dessus, requiert que les conditions soit respectées pour <strong>permettre la redistribution</strong>. &#8220;Permettre la redistribution&#8221; si on n&#8217;impose pas de frais, cela signifie &#8220;redistribuabilité sans frais&#8221;. La question est: cette &#8220;permission de redistribuer&#8221; est elle requise par la licence? Je pense que oui.</p>
<p>C&#8217;est tordu…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

